Sold by: Amazon. Something went wrong. Please try your request again later. Are you an author? Help us improve our Author Pages by updating your bibliography and submitting a new or current image and biography. Learn more at Author Central.
|Country:||Moldova, Republic of|
|Published (Last):||4 September 2014|
|PDF File Size:||20.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He died this summer, on June 29 Billions of euros' worth of developmental aid has been made available by European countries and the EU since the independence of African states. Why is Africa still suffering so badly? The independence of francophone countries was violated in favour of establishing neo-colonies, in the strictest sense of the word, with black governors who essentially maintained the structures of colonial exploitation.
These systems are in many cases still in place. The cause of poverty is very simple: we have illegitimate governments which represent external interests. A number of these presidents are paid by Elf [the former French oil company that merged with TotalFina], for example.
They serve Elf and France but not their own country. They get their medical treatment in France, their children study in France: they therefore don't concern themselves with health and education at home.
On the British side, the mechanisms at work are different due to different colonial practices: indirect rule. The British withdrew from the territories and didn't set up governments directly manipulated by London.
What is Europe's role now? The problem with Europe is that it is not really interested in its relationship with Africa. It tends to delegate the political aspects — the most important questions — to the former colonial powers, that is, France, Belgium, Great Britain and Portugal to a certain extent.
This means accepting their savoir faire, which is a knowledge of colonial exploitation. At the beginning of the s, Jacques Chirac claimed that "Africa is not yet ready for democracy". Today, a central element of the Cotonou Agreement is the promotion of democracy and human rights. Has France's opinion changed? Verschave: The Nobel Prize winner Wole Soyinka made the following retort to Chirac's statement: "Do you think that Africa has ever been ready for dictatorship?
It wasn't the same form of democracy that we know, but it was swept aside by centuries of external oppression. Africa must reconquer the foundations and mechanisms of political legitimacy. Obviously, the ex-colonisers are in no position to give lessons.
For fifty years, all of Africa's peoples have been calling for the possibility of choosing their leaders and getting rid of those they don't want any more. Europe is dominated by big powers who are 'interested' in Africa — notably France, which put systems of electoral fraud in place. Even Mobutu [ex-President of the Democratic Republic of Congo] towards the end of his life said that he would be willing to submit to the ballot box's verdict — if France organised the elections.
So France has still not accepted democracy in Africa, which goes against the Cotonou Agreement. Verschave: France organises and supports tens of African dictatorships, including the worst caricatures in Togo and Gabon, and Robert Mugabe.
When the Madagascans rose up in protest against vote fixing, France supported the dictator Ratsiraka to the last. But all hope is not lost: in , there was practically no democratically elected government in Africa; today a quarter of the 54 states have one. So progress is being made. What we can say, however, is that France has done its best to thwart this evolution, and that in general the other countries of the European Union have bowed to France's savoir faire.
How could the independent initiative of the African Union contribute to the emancipation of the continent and to solving its problems? Verschave: All the big leaders involved in African independence were Pan-Africans. They knew that to get their continent out of its alienation it needed to be united, and that the borders it inherited from colonisation were impractical. So, for all those people, there was no doubt that independence and emancipation would be pan-African.
This Pan-African movement was sabotaged — particularly by France — and is just being reborn now. The African Union can contribute to establishing political legitimacy and African solidarity. The setting up of a sort of Security Council, an African Court of Human Rights and so on, can help mechanisms of political regulation to emerge. All of that is absolutely fundamental. Verschave: We put considerable hope into the EU's policies towards Africa.
We thought that, in a Europe of 25, countries without a colonial tradition — and which can therefore look at the relationship with Africa from a point of view less influenced by the desire to pursue colonial interests — would be in the majority. But what is worrying is that we are getting the impression that the former colonisers are teaching neo-colonial methods to the other countries, rather than the opposite.
Goetz Nordbruch has been reading it. Without a thorough overhaul of the foreign aid machinery of assistance, the world will not reach the Millennium Development Goals. For weeks, there's been nothing but news about all things coronavirus. Cartoonists need no more than a few lines to trigger emotions like fear and sadness, but also hope for the day when this crisis is finally over.
By Suzanne Cords. Skip to main content. Will Europe's policies on Africa steer clear of neo-colonialism? At the beginning of the s, Jacques Chirac claimed that "Africa is not yet ready for democracy" - But has it ever been ready for dicatatorship, Verschave asks. All Topics. Professor Nasser Kanani on the Persian poet Hafez "The joyful audacity of his spirit, the melody of his poetry". War crimes on the Hindu Kush? Death by drone — the United States' vicious Afghan legacy.
Interview with a mixed-faith couple Experiences in a Christian-Muslim marriage. Sexuality in Iran Facing a "sex putsch". In brief Pakistan court defers blasphemy judgement on death row appeal. Joy in Gaza as mosques re-open after coronavirus closure.
UK's Iraq war crimes probe dismisses all but one complaint. Egypt and UAE welcome Libya ceasefire talks. Social media and networks. Subscribe to our newsletter. Most Recent Photo Essay.
De la Françafrique à la Mafiafrique
Here, briefly, I shall explain what the term refers to : the secret criminality in the upper echelons of French politics and economy, where a kind of underground Republic is hidden from view. In , events forced De Gaulle to grant independence to the French colonies of black Africa. This newly-proclaimed international legality was the unsullied tip of the iceberg : France as the best friend of Africa, development and democracy. Meanwhile, Jacques Foccart, "the man in the shadows", was given the task of maintaining dependence, using inevitably illegal, secret and shameful methods.
Similar authors to follow
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Verschave notes that the substance of his book grew out of testimonies given by Africans who want to tell the stories of their plight and wanton pillaging of their respective countries by France, the ex-colonizer:. They observed that their countries have been torn apart and put asunder by colonial policies implemented by dictatorial governments. Denis Sassou Nguesso, who has outlived them, now coordinates the dirty job of France in Africa. According to him, only the tip of the iceberg is visible to the rest of the world; the rest is a closely guarded secret known only to its perpetrators in very high positions of power in France and Africa:. It has a visible face, the part that is exposed to the world, portraying France as the best friend of Africa and bastion of human rights, etc. Needless to belabor the point that Verschave is being terribly sarcastic when he refers to France the best friend of Africa and the bastion of human rights.